Data shows a nearly 50% drop in near-total outsourcing of student writing when done in a transparent writing environment

07.10.2026

Turnitin's latest Learning Integrity Insights Report highlights how students and educators are engaging with AI 

OAKLAND, Calif., Oct. 7, 2026 /PRNewswire/ -- According to Turnitin's Q3 Learning Integrity Insights Report, students who wrote within Turnitin Clarity, a transparent, AI guided writing environment, were nearly 50% less likely to fully outsource their work to AI compared to those who wrote outside the platform.

What did the report find?

  • US Submission: Near-total outsourcing (greater than 80% AI writing score) is 14.3% in non-Turnitin Clarity submissions and only 7.6% within Turnitin Clarity.1
  • A/NZ Submissions: 6.7% of non-Turnitin Clarity submissions had a >80% AI writing score, compared to 3.96% within Turnitin Clarity.2
  • UK Submissions: Saw a more modest difference, with 9.6% of non-Turnitin Clarity submissions with a >80% AI writing score, compared to 7.2% within Turnitin Clarity.3

"Transparency is key to better learning outcomes," said Annie Chechitelli, Chief Product Officer. "A transparent writing space, like Turnitin Clarity, gives educators visibility into how a student's work comes together, allowing them to provide more meaningful guidance. When students understand how their work is being evaluated, the anxiety around AI detection can be reduced, along with the temptation to outsource their thinking entirely. The result is a learning environment that protects critical thinking and nurtures learning integrity."

Do students overuse AI when given access?

Transparency may ease student anxiety around AI, but the data also revealed something unexpected about how students choose to use AI, or not. After analyzing nearly 840,000 prompts submitted through the AI assistant enabled in Turnitin Clarity, Turnitin found:

  • 66 percent of students completed their writing assignments without engaging the AI assistant at all.
  • 20 percent used between one and five prompts;
  • And just 14% used 6 or more prompts per assignment.
  • This pattern remained consistent across both secondary and higher education, as well as across the United States, United Kingdom and Australia/New Zealand.4 

AI use varies by educational level

The way students use AI assistance differs notably between secondary students and higher education settings.

Secondary students tend to use AI early in the writing process. Of the 22,000 preset prompts used inside Turnitin Clarity by secondary students, help brainstorming (used 4,140 times) and help drafting an outline (used 3,764 times) were the most popular choices.5 Higher education students are more likely to use AI for quality checks and evaluation. Feedback against rubrics and assignment organization was the top-used preset prompt, used 1,976 times.6

Why institutional AI policies fall flat

While institutional AI policy adoption has increased,7 many educators and students still lack clarity on how these policies are put into practice.

Within Turnitin Clarity, the AI chat assistant can be configured at both the institutional and educator level. At the institutional level, Insights reveals 50% of institutions kept the AI assistant always enabled, 45% allowed for flexible use—meaning they could toggle it off or on depending on the assignment or class needs—and only 5% completely disabled it.8 However, at the educator level, that flexibility narrows to more of an all-or-nothing approach, with 73% of classes having the AI assistant always enabled and 13% having it always disabled.9 

Institutional AI policies need to translate meaningfully into the classroom. Without practical tools that empower educators to dial up or down AI access by assignment, institutional policies remain little more than words on a page. The result leaves educators struggling in an all-or-nothing situation, that neither protects learning integrity nor teaches students the skills to use AI responsibly.

Read the full Learning Integrity Insights Report https://go.turnitin.com/us/learning-integrity-insights-report-q3 

Submissions showing a >80% AI score in Turnitin against non-Turnitin Clarity submissions with a >80% AI writing score from July 1, 2025 through August 26, 2026.

1 US: submission sample size 15,299 Clarity; 2.3M non-Clarity.

2 UK: submission sample size 366 Clarity; 268,818 non-Clarity.

3 A/NZ: submission sample size 956 Clarity; 312,003 non-Clarity.

4 Analyzed 840,889 prompts from users across US, UK, and A/NZ who used the AI assistant in Turnitin Clarity from July 2025 to August 21, 2026. No engagement (103,343 compositions or 66%), 1-5 prompts (30,740 compositions or 20%), 6+ prompts (22,000+ or 14%).

5 Analysis of nearly 22,000 preset prompts in Turnitin Clarity used by secondary education from July 2025 to August 21, 2026.

6 Analysis of nearly 10,000 preset prompts in Turnitin Clarity used by higher education from July 2025 to August 21, 2026.

7 Tyton Partners: Time for Class 2026: The AI Tipping Point: From Monitoring Students to Engaging Them, June 2026.

8 Analysis of more than 19,000 assignments over 957 institutions in both secondary and higher education from July 2025 to August 21, 2026. At the institutional level: 50% = 511 institutions, 45% = 454 institutions and 5% = 51.

9 Analysis of more than 19,000 assignments over 957 institutions in both secondary and higher education from July 2025 to August 21, 2026. At the instructor level, 73% = 693 instructors, 13% = 125 instructors and 14% = 133 instructors.

Press Contact:

press@turnitin.com 

About Turnitin

Turnitin stands with educators and institutions as champions of learning integrity who understand the enduring value of education in a rapidly changing world. As a global company with more than 16,000 customers in 185 countries and territories and more than 25 years of experience working closely with educators, Turnitin designs every product it builds to address timely needs in today's learning settings. From integrity solutions offering transparency in the writing process to delivering secure high-stakes and course assessments, Turnitin provides educators and researchers with the tools they need to navigate responsible use of AI in education and the learning experience. Learn more at turnitin.com.

Cision View original content to download multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.co.uk/news-releases/data-shows-a-nearly-50-drop-in-near-total-outsourcing-of-student-writing-when-done-in-a-transparent-writing-environment-302900737.html

Berliner Linke in der Kritik: Koalitionsgespräche scheitern vorerst am Antisemitismus-Thema

08.10.2026

Die Bildung einer neuen Landesregierung in Berlin bleibt vorerst ungewiss. Linke, Grüne und SPD konnten sich zweieinhalb Wochen nach der Wahl zum Abgeordnetenhaus weiterhin nicht auf eine gemeinsame Linie im Umgang mit Antisemitismus verständigen. Nach dem dritten sogenannten Vorgespräch verließ die Spitze der drei Parteien am Mittwochnachmittag den Tagungsort ohne öffentliche Stellungnahme. Nach Informationen der Deutschen Presse-Agentur gilt eine Einigung in der Frage als zentrale Voraussetzung, um in formelle Sondierungsgespräche über eine mögliche Regierung unter Führung der Linken einzusteigen.

Bereits für Donnerstag ist ein weiteres Treffen angesetzt. Ziel ist es, in dem seit geraumer Zeit in Berlin heftig diskutierten Themenkomplex voranzukommen. Vor allem Teile der Berliner Linken stehen seit längerem wegen Positionen zu Israel, Palästina und zum Thema Antisemitismus in der Kritik. Dabei geht es insbesondere um Äußerungen einzelner Parteimitglieder, die öffentlich als antisemitisch eingestuft oder entsprechend kritisiert wurden. Ohne eine belastbare Verständigung auf gemeinsame Grundsätze wollen SPD und Grüne nach eigener Darstellung den nächsten Schritt hin zu einem möglichen Regierungsbündnis nicht gehen.

Zusätzliche Brisanz erhielt die Debatte durch eine Wahlparty der Neuköllner Linken am 20. September. Dort waren nach dpa-Informationen sowohl ein Oberhaupt eines arabischstämmigen und zum Teil kriminellen Clans als auch ein umstrittener propalästinensischer Aktivist anwesend. Letzterer soll der Volksfront für die Befreiung Palästinas (PFLP) nahestehen, die von der EU als Terrororganisation eingestuft wird. Der Vorfall hat bei den potenziellen Koalitionspartnern für erhebliche Irritationen gesorgt und den Druck auf die Linke erhöht, sich klarer zu Antisemitismus, Rassismus und organisierter Kriminalität zu positionieren.

SPD und Grüne verlangen vor Beginn offizieller Sondierungen eine verbindliche Verständigung zu diesen Themenfeldern. Sondierungen sind die Vorstufe zu formalen Koalitionsverhandlungen, in denen ein Regierungsprogramm und die Ressortzuschnitte ausgehandelt würden. Ohne Konsens über den künftigen Kurs im Kampf gegen Antisemitismus und im Umgang mit problematischen Milieus in der Stadt bleibt der Weg zu einem möglichen Rot-Grün-Roten Bündnis aber blockiert. Welche Alternativen zu einem solchen Bündnis am Ende realistisch wären, ist bislang offen; entscheidend bleibt vorerst, ob die drei Parteien in der strittigen Grundsatzfrage noch zu einer gemeinsamen Linie finden.